Rector's Directive No. 59/2017 ****************************************************************************************** * ****************************************************************************************** Effect: 1 September 2017 ****************************************************************************************** * Principles for Competition of Top-Quality Monographs at Charles University ****************************************************************************************** *========================================================================================= * Article 1 – Call for, Procedure for, and Acceptance of Nominations *========================================================================================= 1.All faculties and other units of Charles University (“CU”) to which means of institution for long-term conceptual development are allocated from the budget of CU in the current (“Faculties”) may take part in the competition. 2.In the current calendar year, monographs from the calendar year before last that are rec Register of Information on the Results (RIV) are evaluated. (Should the RIV not be acces reason whatsoever, monographs recorded in the Personal Bibliographic Database (OBD) in t will be considered.) 3.The Faculties will select max. 20% of monographs in the Czech or Slovak language which t most valuable from among those they produced, however, at least one monograph. In additi selection, the Faculties may nominate an indefinite number of foreign language monograph 4.Each nominated monograph is accompanied by a brief reasoning on its scientific excellenc dean of a faculty (director of another unit), as well as with reviews thereof, if availa 5.If a monograph has more than one author, a contribution by the corresponding part of the authors from the relevant faculty is included in the limit under paragraph 3. In the cas monographs, the share in authorship of the faculty authors will be marked in the hand-ov 6.The Faculties will deliver selected publications, including handover reports, to the Dep Science and Research of the Rector’s Office of CU, where they will be made available to evaluation boards. *========================================================================================= * Article 2 – Evaluation Boards *========================================================================================= 1.The Research Board of CU will appoint two 11-member evaluation boards, one for the human other for the fields of medicine and natural sciences. 2.Membership in an evaluation board (“the Board”) is incompatible with the performance of the Rector, Vice-Rector, dean or vice-dean. 3.The Board for the humanities will comprise one expert from each of the following Faculti Theological Faculty, Protestant Theological Faculty, Hussite Theological faculty, Facult Faculty of Arts, Faculty of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities the History of Charles University and Archive of Charles University, Centre for Theoreti Centre for Economic Research and Graduate Education. 4.The Board for the fields of medicine and natural sciences will comprise one expert from following Faculties: First Faculty of Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Third Facult Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Faculty of Pharmac Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, a Centre. The Research Board of CU will further appoint as a member of this Board one expe an employment relationship with CU. 5.A member of the Board for the humanities may have only one employment contract concluded the units under paragraph 3. A member of the Board for the fields of medicine and natura have only one employment contract concluded with one of the units under paragraph In the eminent employee of CU, the Research Board of CU may appoint as a member of the Board an (including a former employee) irrespective of the condition prescribed in the first and of this paragraph. 6.Members of the Boards must commit themselves in writing to an unbiased evaluation of wor on their scientific quality. 7.A member of the Board will be remunerated for the work thereon. 8.The Academic Senate of CU will nominate its observer to each Board. *========================================================================================= * Article 3 – Evaluation Process and Determination of Financial Reward *========================================================================================= 1.Each member of the Board will award each monograph a whole number of points between 0 an may exclude from evaluation publications which have been nominated for competition but w monographs. 2.Any evaluator/member of each of the Boards may award the same number of points to no mor of the monographs under evaluation. 3.A member of the Board may not evaluate publications nominated by the Faculty with which employment relationship. A former employee of CU may not evaluate publications from the he/she was employed. 4.The final evaluation of each of the monographs will be determined as the average of poin the respective evaluators. 5.Based on the total of all final evaluations, the financial value of one point will be as the financial reward for each monograph will be determined according to the final evalua given monograph. 6.The financial reward may be granted to no more than 75% of nominated publications in eac Therefore, the evaluations of publications which will not be granted a reward are not in total of all final evaluations under paragraph 5. 7.The Boards will prepare a brief report on each evaluated monograph. In the absence of a required expertise, the Board may, for the purposes of the preparation of a report, appr expert who, however, has no vote. 8.In order to provide support for monographs evaluated in the current calendar year, an am in the budget of CU is earmarked. 9.The results of the evaluation of monographs are to be published by 31st May of the given 10Funds provided in the form of reward for respective monographs are provided to a relevan least one half of those means, including any possible deductions, must be used to reward the monograph, or member(s) of the team of authors from the relevant Faculty. *========================================================================================= * Article 4 – Final Provisions *========================================================================================= 1.This directive becomes effective on 1st September 2017. 2.Rector’s Directives No. 3/2011, No. 15/2015 and No. 11/2017 are hereby repealed. In Prague on 30th August 2017 Prof. MUDr. Tomáš Zima, DrSc., MBA Rector