Consolidated Rector's Directive No. 9/2014, as amended by Rector's Directives No. 17/2014 ****************************************************************************************** * ****************************************************************************************** Recommended assessment criteria for granting associate professorship and for the appointme professorship, and the minimum requirements for content of the justification to be drawn u associate professorship commission and by the commission in the full professorship appoint including determination of essential elements of Charles University documents to be submit ****************************************************************************************** * Article 1 ****************************************************************************************** Based on Articles 5, 15, and 19 of the Code of Procedure for the Granting of Associate Pro Full Professorship of Charles University, this directive sets out: a.recommended assessment criteria for the procedure of granting associate professorship an professorship (“the Recommended Criteria”), and b.minimum requirements for the content of the justification to be drawn up by the associat commission and by the commission in the full professorship appointment procedure, as wel elements of documents to be submitted, which particularise the assessment of scholarly a qualifications, as well as the teaching competence of a candidate. ****************************************************************************************** * Article 2 ****************************************************************************************** 1.Recommended assessment criteria serve as grounds for the steps of associate professorshi (the procedure for the granting of associate professorship – “habilitation procedure”), commissions in the full professorship appointment procedures. 2.The task of the commissions is to assess the data submitted by a candidate at the time t was commenced, as well as the candidate’s particular scholarly and pedagogical activitie thereto, in its report, the commission in the full professorship appointment procedure m mention acts and other reasons for which the candidate may be regarded as an internation researcher. ****************************************************************************************** * Article 3 ****************************************************************************************** Recommended assessment criteria are set out in Parts 1.1 – 1.4 [ URL "UKEN-894- version1-2017_26_prilohy_1_1_to_1_4.doc"] of the attachment hereto, whereas: a.Part 1.1 of the attachment hereto sets out the generally applicable assessment criteria; b.Part 1.2 of the attachment thereto sets out the recommended assessment criteria for huma sciences, and artistic-creative branches; c.Part 1.3 of the attachment hereto sets out the recommended assessment criteria for branc sciences; and d.Part 1.4 of the attachment hereto sets out the recommended assessment criteria for branc ****************************************************************************************** * Article 4 ****************************************************************************************** Minimum requirements for the content of the justification drawn up by an associate profess and by a commission in the full professorship appointment procedure, as well as essential documents to be submitted, which particularise the assessment of the candidate’s scholarly qualifications, and his/her teaching competence, are set out in Parts 2.1. – 2.6. of the a whereas: a.Part 2.1 [ URL "UKEN-894-version1-2017_26_priloha_2_1.doc"] of the attachment hereto set minimum requirements for the justification of the opinion of the associate professorship b.Part 2.2 [ URL "UKEN-894-version1-2017_26_priloha_2_2.doc"] of the attachment hereto set requirements for data about a candidate in the habilitation procedure; c.Part 2.3 [ URL "UKEN-894-version1-2017_26_priloha_2_3.doc"] of the attachment hereto set requirements for attachments to the documents submitted to the Rector’s Office of Charle connection with the habilitation procedures; d.Part 2.4 [ URL "UKEN-894-version1-2017_26_priloha_2_4.doc"] of the attachment hereto set minimum requirements for the justification of the opinion of the commission in the full appointment procedure; e.Part 2.5 [ URL "UKEN-894-version1-2017_26_priloha_2_5.doc"] of the attachment hereto set requirements for data about a candidate of full professorship; and f.Part 2.6 [ URL "UKEN-894-version1-2017_26_priloha_2_6.doc"] of the attachment hereto set requirements for attachments to the documents to be submitted to the Rector’s Office of University in connection with the procedure for the appointment of full professorship. ****************************************************************************************** * Article 5 ****************************************************************************************** (Repealed) ****************************************************************************************** * Article 6 ****************************************************************************************** 1.This directive becomes effective on 1 February 2014. 2.The Consolidated Rector’s Directive No. 9/2014, as amended by Rector’s Directives No. 17 26/2017 becomes effective on 1 April 2017. Prof. MUDr. Tomáš Zima, DrSc., MBA, m.p.